Solving the Problem of Doubts: Keeping Perspective

See the way I look at the issue of skepticism is kinda like this: the problem of doubts is not merely an intellectual problem. People are people, not machines; they are not driven by intellectual motivations alone. We do have a certain freedom in choosing our beliefs, our emotions can play into our choices, and they have the potential to make our decisions biased toward either side. Psychologists, with their knowledge about the subconscious and other related issues, can shed more light on this. So it very well may be that the doubt in your mind owes its existence at least partially to emotional reasons. We will talk more about this a bit later.

But with this said, I also maintain that the problem of doubts isn’t merely an emotional or spiritual problem either. Some people mistakenly think whenever someone has a doubt, it is because of the fact that he is spiritually lacking; and therefore their solution to these is to bottle up the problems, instead of facing them. But it might very well be that the doubt in your mind is a valid, genuine, legitimate intellectual question, requiring an objective answer. Bottling up such a doubt will only increase the “itch”. In such a case you would have to get your hands dirty and do the research yourself from the proper sources.

Since doubts may potentially originate at either of the two levels: intellectual or spiritual, our defense against these doubts need to be at these two levels as well. Very often people forget this, they try to cater to their intellectual need, and completely ignore their spiritual need. This is what this article is about.

If you try to be perceptive about how your doubts work, you might notice the following phenomenon. Let’s say you have a doubt about Islaam. Panic kicks in, but you nonetheless try and work to find the solution. After a while you do find the solution, and it seems plausible. But even after this, it just doesn’t feel right. You have the answer to your doubt, there is nothing of merit that can be said against it, it seems sound overall, but still the agitation doesn’t go away. Or it could be that the problem you have is very, very small, so much so that it hardly challenges the Islaamic worldview at all, but for some inexplicable reason it’s giving you a hard time. In these cases, it is kind of apparent that the problem doesn’t have that much to do with intellect. At an intellectual level, you have your answer, things make sense on paper. Even so, you are lacking confidence or clarity, there isn’t tranquility in your heart. I have experienced this countless times. These are confusing times, because there is no doubt or problem to address, you already have your answer and it seems to make sense; but still at some inexplicable level, it doesn’t seem to make sense. Kind of like an awkward, pesky ‘what if it’s wrong?’ position that you can’t shake off. Many people, when faced with this situation, mistakenly assume their problem to be intellectual. “Maybe the evidence isn’t strong enough” they tell themselves, even after the evidence seems perfectly plausible on paper having no legitimate counters to it.

I have found a way out of this, and here it is. As stated above (and is kind of common sensical), human beings have two faculties, faculties of reason and faculties of emotion. My position is, the clarity of reason is not the same as clarity of emotion. Many people think emotional clarity is essentially a causal product of intellectual clarity. I would disagree. Just because something makes sense to the intellect, doesn’t necessarily mean it’s gonna make sense to your emotional or spiritual faculties as well. In other words, your intellectual clarity- the fact that things make sense in paper- isn’t automatically going to translate into the tranquility of heart. The latter, in fact, might need a different sort of effort, namely prayer or asking help from Allah. People who mistakenly think this problem is purely intellectual might be averse to praying, because it would seem like praying is essentially indoctrinating themselves to a certain direction, done only to cover up the weakness of their intellectual position. So in order to be “intellectually honest”, they view seeking help from Allah or praying as something that fuels an unjustified bias. This mentality is patently flawed because as discussed above, because the problem is not intellectual to begin with, it is emotional; so the question of covering up intellectual gaps or indoctrination to a certain position just isn’t there.

See the thing is, you need to be able to diagnose the nature of your specific problem, you need to know if the problem you’re facing is intellectual or emotional. If you think your problem is intellectual when in reality it is not, then no amount of evidence is gonna give you clarity. To achieve this, you need to have perspective of things, and perceptive of what goes on between your head and heart. You need to be cautious enough to know an emotional problem when you see one, without getting it confused as an intellectual problem. From my personal experience, prayer actually helps in this situation. Maybe it’s the calmness of mind that prayer gives you, maybe it’s divine intervention, maybe both. But from multiple personal experiences, I have seen prayer not only generates emotional or spiritual clarity, it also gives you a clear, objective perspective of things as they are.

All of this is theory. Let me share some personal experiences.

I was on the bus one day, reading a Bradley Monton book. The author is an atheist, and he was talking about some of the refutations of the fine-tuning argument for the existence of God. His counter arguments seemed strong and convincing. As a Muslim who takes intellectual arguments seriously, I was supposed to freak out. But I decided to remain calm, and told myself that I will think both sides through when I get home. When I went home, I washed and prayed calmly, and somewhere inbetween these, things started making sense. This is how: I remembered that although I liked to talk about natural theology (i.e. rational arguments for the existence of God), it wasn’t what gave me conviction in Islaam. My conviction in Islaam came more from the specific evidences for Islaam, e.g. the Qur’an’s literary characteristics, prophecies, and so on. So even if Dr. Monton’s arguments against the fine-tuning argument were fullproof, they couldn’t take anything from my faith since I didn’t base my faith on it to begin with. And this is only based on the assumption that Dr. Monton’s arguments are sound and nothing can be said against them. Other considerations popped into my head as well, but I think the point has been made. I was able to deal with the doubt while keeping both my heart and mind satisfied because I had perspective: perspective about the doubts themselves, the potential damage they may cause to my worldview, and the specific nature of my problem.

Here’s a contrasting example to further illustrate my point. A few months back, I stumbled upon an article about Dr. Richard Lenski’s “Long Term Evolution Experiment”. This was an experiment about bacterial evolution, and the results documented evidence of comparatively large-scale change in a species, which was said to be evidence for evolution to an extent. Unfortunately for me, this time I wasn’t able to take my doubt calmly. I promptly phased into panic, and this lasted for a painful couple of days. If I had perspective at that time, this would not have happened. Islaam is not opposed to the concept of changes from species to species at all, much less bacterial evolution (if you want to read up on Islaam’s view on evolution, this is perhaps the best place to go: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXxQXX3l7mg); so this should not have troubled me at all. I guess all the propaganda about evolution being fatal to theism contributed to my sorry state of affairs. But anyways, I failed to deliver because I didn’t have perspective of things.

The take-away point from all of this is simple: the anatomy of a doubt is quite often hard to figure out. One thing is certain however, besides an intellectual element, a doubt can even have an emotional element, sometimes almost exclusively so. The Muslim going through his “skepticism” days need to keep this in mind, and work to properly diagnose the nature of his doubts. As a general advice however, do your study to address an intellectual doubt, but make sure you pray and ask Allah’s help to take care of the spiritual element of the problem.

NEWS: ‘Junk DNA’ is not actually ‘Junk’ – ‘Now scientists know that almost every fragment of DNA has a purpose.’

Asalaamu alaykum (peace be upon you)!

In the past we’d hear claims that DNA was majority ‘junk’ and unneeded, many theists would reply that it probably does have a purpose and scientists just don’t know enough about DNA. Well guess what? The theists were right!

Project drops idea of ‘junk’ DNA

6/9(September)/2012

A massive research project has effectively scrapped the concept of “junk” DNA and paved the way for a medical revolution.

The findings, reported in some 30 research papers, show that around 80% of the genetic code is actively involved in keeping life going.

A team of more than 400 scientists from 32 laboratories around the world identified four million “switches” that determine whether genes are turned on or off.

In future, scientists hope the findings will lead to a deeper understanding of numerous diseases and help them devise more effective diagnostic tools and treatments.

Until recently large amounts of the human genetic code, or genome, were dismissed as “junk” – DNA sequences that had no function.

Experts only began to realise that junk DNA might have a useful regulatory role in the 1990s. But even 10 years ago, when the Human Genome Project mapped the first definitive blueprint of the “book of life”, much of the genome was thought to be junk. Now scientists know that almost every fragment of DNA has a purpose.

Speaking at the Science Museum in central London, Dr Ewan Birney, chief analysis co-ordinator on the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements project, known as Encode, said: “We’re going to find out ways of helping us understand disease, avoid disease, prevent disease and perhaps cure disease in different ways from this, but I’m not going to be able to put my finger on this disease or that disease right now.”

He added: “It’s clinical researchers and doctors who are going to be the people who I think will benefit from this. I’m a kind of servant to that community of researchers.”

The scientist, who is also the associate director of the European Bioinformatics Institute in Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, said the new information should not only be appreciated by scientists and doctors, but by everyone who wants to understand how humans work.

So much data was generated by the project that it had to be spread across three major science journals, Nature, Genome Biology and Genome Research. Together they published 30 open-access papers online.

The PRESS ASSOCIATION: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5jdX-LmIU3ydlxF-m1xCgE9wohwHg?docId=N0391741346809816170A&hl=en&lr=all

Debating Evolution & the Origins of Life – you don’t need to!

Asalaamu alaykum (peace be upon you)

When you’re caught up in a debate with atheists, even if you’re talking about God – you’ll always be forced into a debate about Evolution.

I’ll tell you this: Stop right there. This is a plan used to fool you, to trap you in a spiders web of worthless debate which the Atheist is most likely a pro in, you will then lose that debate because you can’t ‘disprove’ evolution and voila! You’re supposedly wrong and atheism is supposedly right.

 

So what am I supposed to do?

Simple: you don’t debate evolution, since when does Evolution prove or disprove the existence of God? (some theists even believe in evolution.) What you need to make clear is the issue of Origins of Life, how did life originate? Often its about Abiogenesis (Life coming into existence from non life). This is the main point where debate could start from, yet even this has problems.

Origins of Life is a hot topic which does not prove atheism. Infact Origins of Life through Abiogenesis is questionable at least; since no studies have proven that life can actually come into existence from non life (no real results have ever been shown to prove that scientists have made a living biological fly from non living materials, or insect, or even more basic – they havn’t even proven a natural mechanism process which shows that a living cell can come into existence by itself and evolve into other evolved beings!) All this Abiogenesis is a hypothesis (meaning: an intellectual guess) and science is decades behind before it can prove anything in this regard (meaning the atheists actually have blind hope and faith that science will prove Abiogenesis, when they dont have anything to stand on right now).

So next time you hear an atheist or agnostic talking about Abiogenesis, then say straight up; Prove it happened. They can’t. So Evolution which happens after that does not even need to be debated, because they can’t even support their claim of life coming into existence from non life with real practical scientific experiment results! It’s just a hypothesis, just an intellectual guess.

 

Conclusion: The same Atheists who criticize you for intellectually believing in God, claiming you’re stupid – its them same atheists who have blind faith in pseudo-science (the same science which might actually prove against their claims in the future!). In other words – they have Blind Faith.

So next time you hear them saying you believe in fairy tales, then tell them – they also believe in fairy tales which aren’t proven by science or history. 🙂

 

“O men! Here is a parable set forth! listen to it! Those on whom, besides Allah, ye call, cannot create (even) a fly, if they all met together for the purpose! and if the fly should snatch away anything from them, they would have no power to release it from the fly. Feeble are those who petition and those whom they petition!”
(Qur’an al Hajj 22:73)

PROPHECY: ” When the belly of Makkah will be cleft open…”

It is narrated by Abdullah bin Umar that the Messenger of God, Muhammad (peace be upon him) said:

 

في أَخْبَارُ مَكَّةَ لِلْفَاكِهِيِّ، ذِكْرُ تَفَجُّرِ مَكَّةَ بِالأَنْهَارِ وَمَا يُكْرَهُ مِنْ ذَلِكَ، 1725 حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو بِشْرٍ بَكْرُ بْنُ خَلَفٍ قَالَ: ثنا الْمُؤَمَّلُ، قَالَ: ثنا شُعْبَةُ، قَالَ: ثنا يَعْلَى بْنُ عَطَاءٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، قَالَ: قَالَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ عَمْرِو بْنِ الْعَاصِ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمَا: “إِذَا رَأَيْتَ مَكَّةَ قَدْ بُعِجَتْ كِظَامًا وَرَأَيْتَ الْبِنَاءَ قَدْ عَلا عَلَى رُءُوسِ الْجِبَالِ، فَاعْلَمْ أَنَّ الأَمْرَ قَدْ أَظَلَّكَ

“When the belly of Makkah will be cut open and through it will be dug out river-like passages (i.e. tunnels) and the buildings of the Holy City of Makkah will rise higher than its mountains, when you observe these signs, then understand that the time of trial is near at hand.”
Abraj al Bait (meaning: the greatest Stellar of Makkah aka
Mecca Royal Hotel Clock Tower is taller than the mountains of Makkah)
Constructed in 2004 and opened in 2012.

The above hadith prophesying the state of Makkah towards the end of time reads more like an eyewitness account from an alien-like future. No concerted attempt has ever been made in Islamic history to claim that this hadith speaks for that time… until now when, much like a camera suddenly coming into focus, we can suddenly see what our beloved Prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) was warning us about. When taken together with several other ahadith, including the famous Hadith of Jibril which speaks of the coming of the Day of Judgment being when “you see poor, naked, barefoot shepherds of sheep and goats competing in constructing tall buildings”, one sees a distinct pattern. This is especially so when combined with the current list of vainglorious monuments to the hubris of the ruling classes over much of the Arab world:

  • World’s tallest skyscraper: Burj Al Khalifa, Dubai, UAE
  • World’s tallest clock tower: Abraj Al Bait Towers, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
  • World’s tallest lighthouse: Jeddah Light, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • World’s tallest minaret: Hassan II Mosque, Casablanca, Morocco.
Makkah clock tower 2

Why doesn’t God show Himself?

Asalaamu alaykum (peace be upon you)!

This articles slightly longer than the rest, so get ready.

There are 2 types of Atheists, theres i) sincere atheists and ii) non sincere atheists.

The ones who are sincere are open to listening to the signs which the Quran brings forward, such as the scientific marvels of the Quran. If you discuss guidance with them, they’ll open up to discussing religion with you, even if they’ve had some bad experiences with it in the past. In simple words – they’re Decent human beings who are good and open minded to you if you discuss with them in a friendly way.

The ones who are non sincere however have set their mind to not accepting any piece of knowledge which opposes their world view (even if they’re the most intellectual of people!), even if newer and clearer convincing knowledge came to them. Why do they do this? Simply so they can stay in their little bubble and fool themselves into believing there isn’t a Judgment Day, there isn’t a God they have to do good actions for and avoid bad actions for. In simple words, they’re happy to remain irresponsible.

The Quran – the book which shakes the World in – the Past, Present & Future!:

The Qur’an is a clear book, infact its the Most Influential and Effective book which has changed the entire history of mankind since it has been spoken out of the mouth of the Messenger of God – Muhammad (peace be upon him). It really is a book which shook the world and changed it forever, changing individuals and civilizations for the better; in the past, is doing in the present and will continue to do so in the future.

Why doesn’t God show Himself then?

The Quranic argument is that God has made us humans similar to animals (that’s actually not a ground breaking thought) – but the fact that God made humans with an intellect, and the ability to achieve way more than animals (like speaking with each other in rich languages (Quranic Arabic being the richest language in the world), having the potential to live in any climate of the world [unlike animals who are usually limited to specific climates only], the fact that God made us upright [physically and also morally]) gives us many advantages the rest of the animal kingdom does not have.

So why doesn’t God show Himself? Because the Quranic argument is that there are:

3 types of knowledge: Instinct, Learned knowledge, and through them both – knowledge of deduction and Certainty (yaqeen).

Animals have Instincts (i.e. fire is hot), Learned knowledge ( i.e. dont touch fire it will burn you), and some deductive knowledge too.

But humans possess these types of knowledge at the highest level. Once people see that the Quranic psychological arguments are extremely powerful, that the Scientific marvels of the Quran were a millenia ahead of their time, they come to the conclusion that the Quran overall must be true or atleast of a miraculous nature (considering an illiterate man from the desert spoke these world-shaking words) – so because you have the ability to comprehend the knowledge of the Quran and its Promises (ie. of God, of a Judgment Day etc)  – then reflecting on the book and its content and history is sufficient for you to that God really exists, He spoke the words of this Book which as never been matched by any other in content or style. Otherwise, why doesn’t someone come up with a book similar to the Quran?

The sincere atheists may well look into this and see convincing points. The non sincere atheists won’t even bother and will ignore it, again – fooling themselves in ignorance. Yet ignorance does not remove the reality of the promises and threats of God against His servants.

Quranic Argument:

Therefore the Quranic argument below applies to the non sincere atheists:

And [even] if We opened to them a gate from the heaven and they continued therein to ascend (elevate and rise),

They would say, “Our eyes have only been dazzled. Rather, we are a people affected by magic (illusions)!”

(Quran Hijr 15: 14-15)

Meaning: these people even if God showed Himself to them! even if they saw the Angels! they would say that our eyes are seeing illusions, we will never believe!

The fact that God has given them the choice to believe or disbelieve willingly (even though they will face consequences for their beliefs and actions on Judgment Day) – this attitude of theirs will prevent them from wanting to believe, so they will bring any excuse to deny the signs that come to them, If they were only Decent people who looked into the Quran – they would find the Knowledge of Certainty in it for their benefit.

Scientific Miracle – the Sperm (Qiyamah 75:37)


Scientific Miracle – the Sperm

 

أَلَمْ يَكُ نُطْفَةً مِّن مَّنِيٍّ يُمْنَىٰ

Had he not [the human] been a sperm from Maniyin yuMNaa?


[Quran Qiyamah 75:37]

Maniy منِي and Yamnaa يمْنَىٰ are derived from ‘MaN’ من.


1st General Meaning
:

Maniy means ‘Semen.’
yaMNaa means ‘to Eject’.

[استمنى] istaMNaa = he Ejaculated the semen.


2nd Meaning
:
Maniy – (darbu al shay’a) = Striking/hitting/Penetrating something.

 

3rd Meaning:

MaNa [ منى] = (he) Cut it.

= (QaTa’ah [قطعه]) (due to the meaning of ‘striking and penetration’ and in effect – Cutting.)

We see the following Implications can be found from the words MaNy/yuMNa:

1 – Semen
2 – Emitted / Ejected.
3 – Striking / Hitting. (Darb)
4 – Cutting (QaTa’ah)

If we use the definitions from above, we see the following;


The male Nutfah (sperm)
is;

1 – Emitted / Ejected
2 – Strikes
3 – and Cuts.


أَلَمْ يَكُ نُطْفَةً مِّن مَّنِيٍّ يُمْنَىٰ

Had he not been a sperm from Maniyin yuMNaa [Ejected Semen- which Strikes, and Cuts.”]

Image: Sperm - Striking, Penetrating and Cutting into the Egg 
during Fertilisation of Pregnancy.


Definitions of 'Maniy' and yuMNa' were according to the Classical Lexicons:
 1. Lisan Al-Arab dictionary [1] , Book 8, Pages 719-721.
 2. Al-Muheet dictionary [2], Page 1226.
 3. Al-Muajam Al-Waseet dictionary [3], Page 888.
 4. Al-Mawrid dictionary Arabic-English section [4], Page 1131.
 5. Arabic-English dictionary the Hans Wehr dictionary [6], Page 927-928
Also see HERE for further detail on these Lexicons.

PROPHECIES!

Asalaamu alaykum (peace be upon you)

There are plenty of Prophecies to prove that Muhammad (peace be upon him) is really a Messenger from God who told future events clearly. One Prophecy which is coming true within this decade is his saying (meaning):
.
“The Hour (of Judgment Day) will not approach until the desert Arab shepherds compete with each other in constructing tall buildings.” (Sahih al Bukhari Vol. 9, Book 88, Hadith 237)
.
Burj Khalifa is the tallest building in the world (in the United Arab Emirates), built by a man (Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum) who was a desert camel shepherd in his childhood. Exactly as Prophecised over 1,400years ago by Muhammad, the Messenger of God (peace be upon him.)

.
More Prophecies of Prophet Muhammad can be found here:
http://www.islamreligion.com/articles/379/

NOTE: If in doubt about whether Nostradamous and other astrologers were as accurate as the Messenger of God, Muhammad (peace be upon him) – then simply take a look at how vague Nostradamous’s statements are and how much they are distorted by his followers to mean peculiar things.

On the other hand, the sayings of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) are as clear as daylight in wording, meaning and even imagery.

Thoughts on the Internet.

Look, I’m not a historian. But this is how the popular story goes.

Traditionally, people weren’t entitled to unrestricted access to information. Information, like commodity, came at a price; and this price happened to be inversely proportional to the sensitivity of the information in question. This was said to apply most significantly with religious information: the quirks of theology, literature on metaphysics and philosophy which supposedly threatened popular beliefs, these were kept well beyond the reach of laity.

And then, the internet happened. I fast forwarded, sorry.

The big coup of this information age, more particularly the world wide web, has been that quite literally anyone with a computer and anything better than a dial-up connection can dig up any amount of information, study, research, make their own informed judgments on things. People don’t have to rely on any holy-spirit-infused-hierarchy any more to learn about religion. They can read from all sides, without having to be biased towards any specific position, which will in turn enable them to tap into the maximum potential of their faculties of reason. The benefits of this are pretty obvious. Trust me when I say I myself have benefited quite a lot.

With that said, I would argue this “unrestricted access” happens to have some significant downslides as well. I’m in no way shape or form promoting internet censorship, so please hear me out. All I’m saying is this: if we want to properly benefit from the internet, we should be aware of the mudslides and pitfalls as well, so we can stroll in peace. The primary and effective solution to these problems, I would argue, is not to censor the internet or anything, but to train ourselves so we can look past its faults and capitalize on its benefits.

First off, when you have an unrestricted flow of anything, not just information, there’s bound to be a mixture of good and bad. That’s common sense. So it shouldn’t be surprising that the internet with its abundant flow of information would have information content that isn’t, well, good. Don’t get me wrong, when I allude to “bad” information, I’m not referring to information that goes against a certain dogma or religion; I’m referring to information that is logically fallacious, not well-reasoned, cherry-picked out of context, appeals to false authority, etc. All of this are either a direct result of, or somewhat connected to, the personal biases and prejudices of the poster. See that’s just the point: an internet is an open forum, where anyone can say anything, which is good in the sense that we can listen to opinions from all sides. But it is bad, in the sense virtually anything can pass as valid information. When the poster on reddit writes against Islaam, his views don’t automatically get peer-reviewed by the experts in the field.

Someone could dismiss all of this by saying, the internet isn’t shoving anything down your throat. If you think the information is valid, accept it. If you don’t, that’s your opinion and you are given full liberty to reject it, or even write against it. This brings us to the second problem, which is: the internet makes an assumption about people, namely that they are mature, reasonable, and rationally trained enough to be able to tell, effectively, good information from problematic information. This assumption is, if not fundamentally wrong, then at least no more than an assumption. In fact, I would go as far to argue that the opposite assumption is more probable.

On a personal note, my experiences with the internet, forged by my long hours on random forums, image boards, and anonymous chat applications, don’t really conjure a positive image about the intellect of the average internetgoer. I would say it’s pretty obvious that the internet has more of a liberal slant- generally speaking- and much of the information content on the internet is heavily influenced by this bias. The prior probability for any religion, more so Islaam, appears to be vanishingly low here. Which is why much of the literature on religion (more on point: against religion) found on the internet is not very substantial, rather a lot of rhetoric is employed, which is no more than a subjective dismissal of religion.

Of course, I’m not saying religious people on the internet are all very intellectual and deserve to be listened to. Common religious writings on the internet have their own brand of logical fallacies which stem from the zeal of the believers. Driven by this zeal, religious people –again I’m generalizing- kind of assume that their view is so manifestly true that any debate on the topic is useless; and this leads them to call out their adversaries. They- perhaps we- don’t really realize that everything about our religion makes sense to us because we are already in it. If we put ourselves in the non-believer’s shoes, with his low prior probability of Islaam, things would appear to make less sense, and would merit more clarification or stronger motivation for belief. Atheist arguments on the other hand generally display another nuance: they seem to appear sophisticated. The mannerisms of internet atheists in general are superior and their posts are well-worded. But sophistication in style and sophistication in content are, of course, mutually exclusive issues.

I guess I’ve only been talking in theory, so an example seems to be in order. A month back or so, I was studying the embryological description as it appears in the Qur’an, and I was also listening to the criticisms made against it, mostly from youtube. I noticed that the style of the presentations are decidedly sophisticated, at least more so than the religious presentations, which are, as stated above, often accompanied by emotive religious zeal. This sophisticated presentation is accompanied by formidable rhetoric, which makes it sound intimidating. But if anyone manages to look beyond the pretense of sophistication, she would easily notice the fallacious nature of reasoning and the misrepresentation of data (not trying to poison the well or anything, you are welcome to visit their videos and see for yourself instead of taking my word for it). These expose the zeal on the part of the atheist as well, which leads to this bad information. So if such a sophisticated presentation, moistened with rhetoric, is placed in the average netgoer’s mouth, that alone is more or less tantamount to shoving it down his throat. “People’s choice” doesn’t seem to circumvent the problem.

A lot can be said on this, but this article is introductory in nature, and it’s not meant to be a database of all instances of logically fallacious arguments that appear on the internet. This post is simply meant to point out that the internet doesn’t deserve our unflinching commitment, and our rationale needs to interact with its information content constantly in order to benefit from it.

Anyways, the solutions I propose?

  1. Train yourself to detect good information content. Learn to debate, learn about the logical fallacies, read analytic philosophers to see how they construct their arguments. Eventually, you will develop a keen sense of looking beyond any sort of rhetoric or pretense and judge the argument(s) for what it is. What I found especially helpful in this regard is reading about philosophy of science. In this sector of philosophy, the use of analytic thought seems to be most relevant and prominent. Read about controversial science issues, like the evolution vs. intelligent design debate that’s going on, and you might learn from how the philosophers of science construct and deconstruct arguments, and your analytic skills will develop. This way, you don’t need to have other people to answer your questions or doubts, you yourself can analyze the arguments and come up with refutations. But here again, the question of making sure the source you are reading from provides valid information comes into play, which brings us to our next point.
  2. Read from reputed, peer-reviewed sources. Yes, even they can go wrong, but the probability of peer-reviewed material being on point would be much higher than the post of the average internet junkie. Also, develop an attachment to books, as opposed to the internet. There are good, reputable sites and blogs on the internet as well, though. Some sources online and offline as example: if you want to follow advice number 1 above and read about philosophy of science, I would direct you to Dr. Steven Meyer’s “Signature in the Cell” or Dr. Bradley Monton’s “Seeking God in Science”. Both of these books focus on construction of arguments. Meyer’s Signature focuses on how he constructed the argument of intelligent design using the existence of specified complexity in DNA, and Dr. Monton’s book, on the other hand, looks into the questions of whether intelligent design qualifies as science, and he analyzes the popular arguments for and against intelligent design to reach the conclusion that the arguments for intelligent design are somewhat, but not definitively,  plausible. If your interest is in natural theology (i.e. theological issues that are not proven using scripture or revelation, but reasoning. For example, existence of God, problem of evil, free will etc.) then I would very highly recommend Dr. William Lane Craig. His site is www.reasonablefaith.org, where you might find information about his books as well. There are lots of other examples, they will show up in the next posts as the blog progresses, Allah willing. I’m sure the authors will share their favorite sources as well.
  3. Learn to see the internet for what it is. Learn to tell opinions from arguments, biases from facts, rhetoric from intellectual discourse. Don’t make abrupt judgments when you come across some thread in a random image board, knock in the proper places for further elucidation of the issue. For example, don’t freak out when you see a post on some internet forum which questions the preservation of the Qur’an. Even if the information he presents seem new, scholarly and convincing, know that a vast amount of research has been done on this, and it is very probable that Muslim academics have figured this out ages ago. Chances are, if you pick up any ‘uloom al Qur’an (Sciences of the Qur’an) book, e.g., Taqi Usmani’s “ ‘Uloomul Qur’an” (it has been translated into English), or Yasir Qadhi’s “Introduction to the Sciences of the Qur’an”, open the chapter on preservation of the Qur’an, your doubts will be put to rest. So never make conclusions based on just one side of the story. This is complimentary to both the points above.
  4. Don’t go looking for debates, or even discussions, when you don’t know your stuff thoroughly. This is very important. Zeal is an appreciable characteristic in action, but not so much in intellectual discourse and decision making. Patiently do your research, study, internalize, then think about engaging whoever is your potential adversary.
  5. Follow this blog. It is impossible to enumerate all the sources you can go to in order to answer your doubts, although 3 or 4 examples have been given above as incidental details. But the authors of this blog were once in your position, they were skeptic of Islaam, but they came back full circle. With the help of Allah, they can answer your questions, or at least lead you to the proper sources, and help you alleviate the doubt that’s biting. Also, as the blog progresses, hopefully more resources, both online and offline, will be made mention of, and increasingly more ground will be covered.

Some concluding remarks would be: a religious worldview is a giant enterprise. It has been the focus of human intellectual discourse for, quite literally, thousands of years. And now with developments in science and philosophy, it only got more complicated and intricate. Virtually nothing in this issue can simply be “written off”. This is something we should stop and appreciate. So if you are a Muslim suffering from skepticism, or claim to be a sincere seeker of truth, I hope a valid expectation from you would be that you would know better than to arbitrarily dismiss claims, driven by a casual reading of the information or this or that random post you stumbled upon. Rather, take your time to patiently study all the relevant, reliable information, analyze, and then try to make a decision being as sincere as you can. The internet will be your friend in this endeavor, only if you know how to maximize its benefit.

Getting out of the depressing zone!

Asalaamu alaykum (peace be on you!)
So I was imagining once when you get stuck in a certain frame of mind and you think life is really depressing, the atheists are becoming aggressive against you in debates while you’re trying hard to cling firmly onto your beliefs. It’s really difficult isn’t it? Sometimes you even get bad thoughts like – I was only trying to defend Islam and now I’m not even getting divine help to increase me in imaan (belief).

You get really sad, disappointed, and always in a state of anxiety and stress. You feel like life will never be the same again and you feel you’ll always be in doubts. Where is the sukoon (calmness and tranquility)? Where is the joy of life? It’s only one question, only one doubt – and I can’t answer it, I can’t even convince myself anymore! – These are the thoughts crossing your mind.

A story:

There was a brother and he was going through exactly this, infact nearly all the people reading this blog have been through this experience. He never knew the answer to an evolutionary question, and he never knew how to reconcile his Islam beliefs with this evolutionary statement by a scientist. Other Muslims might have other doubts, ranging from Islamic beliefs, to an event in Islamic history. So what should you do?

Anyway this brother who was extremely depressed wasn’t sure if he was even Muslim anymore based on that doubt. So we encouraged him to take a step back. Take a step back from what? Take a step back from this lifestyle you’ve forced yourself into. Alot of people don’t realise, their doubts are there because they tried to tell non muslims about aspects of Islam which they themselves were not qualified enough to discuss! If you don’t know the answer, simply leave the conversation, and ask Allah to not be held blameworthy because you tried your best with the knowledge you had. Infact its even easier nowadays because the internet is anonymous. So you would tell what you know, if they didn’t accept it – then leave them and try to increase your imaan somewhere else, because the biggest priority is to save your own self before converting others to the guidance.

 

Ignoring the Insignificant things – & hoping good from Allah

So we said to the brother that this evolutionary reconciliation isn’t too important, that it won’t harm his life if he just stays away from topics related to evolution for a few weeks. So alhamdulillah he did that, he left evolution topics, and we encouraged him to go to the countryside (he actually went ‘Umrah at Makkah) to increase his reflections on the beauty of the world, and just hoping good from Allah. So he went to Makkah and made alot of prayers, hoping they would be answered. You need to do exactly this, you need to hope for an opportunity for Allah to answer your du’a (Short term wishes [like Allah make my day happy], and Long term wishes [O Allah, be happy with me when i return back to You] – so if the short term ones come true, you have hope your long time ones have also been heard.)

When he was at Makkah, one of his short term wishes came true. This increased him in his spirituality and imaan. So he tried it again, having hope from Allah that his wishes would come true. So he hoped good from Allah, so Allah was good to him. This is how you need to be.

So he came back to his home country and now he has strong imaan – yet he still doesn’t know the answer to his question! Why doesn’t that matter? Because his whole life doesn’t depend on that evolutionary gap, its insignificant to him now. He’s got certainty in the promise of Allah. Why? Because there are greater truths which convince people that God really exists, that He hears and answers prayers. You just need to throw yourself into hoping good from Him, then He will be kind to you. If you don’t hope good from Allah, then don’t expect anything good to come your way either.

 

BOOK: ADAM – an adventure story (50pages)

ADAM
an adventure story…


…imagine, you landed on an empty planet…


A good story which gives you an experience with the Guidance.

and filled with adventure, humour and excitement…



Get the EBook for free:


Download 1 (Adobe Reader PDF)
Download 2 (MS Word)

Download 3 (MOBI format – for Kindles)
Download 4 (EPUB format)

http://archive.org/details/Adam-FindingTheStraightRoadadventureStory


“this drop of liquid, can rule the world!”

Enjoy and share with your friends!